Repetative Parallelism

Here is some random stuff that I found on Repetative Parallelism- Nothing Concrete- just some references:

Parallelism runs over us like as series of waves driving the message home. There are different kinds of parallelism:
semantic parallelism
Synonomous parallelism (e.g. Ps. 2)
Identical - Ps.24:1
Similar - Ps.19:2
Antithetic parallelism - Ps.1:6; Prov.10:1
The thesis & antithesis are making the same point.
Synthetic/Constructive parallelism (everything that doesn't fit the other patterns)
Completion (a parallelism of rhythm rather than of meaning) - Ps.2:6
Comparison - Prov.15:17
Reason - Prov.26:4
Climactic or repetitive parallelism - Ps.29:1
Emblematic parallelism - Prov. 25:25, 11:22, Ps. 26:2, 42:1
The use of imagery in conjunction with parallelism.
Pivot pattern - Ps. 98:2
A clause is shared between two lines.
Chiasm (e.g. Ps1:1,6)
The entire 2nd Psalm is a chiastic form (1-3 & 10-12)
grammatical parallelism
This involves the repetition of the parts of speech from one line to the next, although not necessarily in the same order (e.g. Ps.2:5; He rebukes them in his anger {verb-direct object-prepositional phrase} and in his wrath he terrifies them {prepositional phrase-verb-direct object}. This serves to tie one line with another.
http://www.xenos.org/classes/psalms/psweek1.htm


a. Staircase parallelism This feature of the parallelistic couplet, otherwise known as 'climactic' or 'repetitive' parallelism, or the 'expanded colon', has long been recognized./23/ Wilfred Watson notes some forty examples,/24/ including Jer. 31.21:
larcy tlwtb ybwv Return, O virgin Israel,hla °yr[ la ybv Return to these your cities.
From a formal perspective, the description 'staircase' is apt, but from a more semantic perspective it is easily seen that such a form is an instance of the parallelism of greater precision. In the example quoted, the Þrst line leaves unstated the place to which Israel is to return; the B-line speciÞes the full signiÞcance of 'return' in A. It is true of course that it is not only that the B-line is more speciÞc than the A-line but also that the A is more speciÞc than the B. Such cases do not negate the parallelism of greater precision; they are a subset of the examples of our feature.
http://www.shef.ac.uk/~biblst/Department/Staff/BibsResearch/DJACcurrres/Postmodern1/Parallelism.html